The Radioactive Nature of the Halos
In 1907 the solution to the halo puzzle came into focus in the geology laboratory of Professor John Joly of Trinity College in Dublin. Joly was quite familiar with halos, especially those in biotite, a dark mica that is easily split into thin slices. Joly realized the diffusion hypothesis could not explain either the well-defined edges of the halo rings, or their regular sizes. He began to consider a radioactive origin for the halos.
By that time scientists knew that uranium is the parent of a radioactive decay chain, with the successive daughter products being called the members of the chain. This decay chain is shown in Figure 1.1 along with other relevant information. Joly was also aware that uranium and its radioactive daughter products decayed in one of two ways: (1) By ejecting a very light fragment (the beta particle), which causes little damage as it passes through matter, or (2) by ejecting a much heavier nuclear fragment (the alpha particle), which interacts rather strongly as it passes through a substance. Because of its light weight the beta particle is easily bounced around and thereby takes a rather unpredictable, zigzag path before it finally comes to rest in matter. The alpha particle, on the other hand, is heavy enough to plow almost straight ahead before it stops.
As Joly thought about which of these particles might be responsible for the halos, doubtless he quickly realized that the light beta particles would be unlikely to produce coloration changes in the mica, and that their zigzag paths could not yield sharp boundaries. The heavier alpha particles seemed much more promising candidates. Studies had shown that most alpha emitters in the uranium decay chain had different energies, with the isotope 238U being the lowest. (See Fig. 1.1 for further explanation.)
Was there a connection between the different energies of those alpha particles and the different sizes of the rings in the halos Joly had observed? Alpha particles having different energies would travel slightly different distances in a mineral. What if some uranium was in the tiny halo center? Could alpha particles from uranium and its daughters cause enough damage to the surrounding mineral to produce the pleochroic halos?
In a mineral, alpha particles lose their energy quite rapidly through collisions with other atoms. A single alpha particle will ionize about 100,000 atoms along its path of travel, leaving in its wake a short damage trail which remains as a permanent scar. On an atomic scale the damage to the mineral is so small that by itself each tiny scar is invisible. Any mineral, such as mica, which contains trace amounts of uranium, will also contain some [p. 19] alpha-damage trails from the uranium atoms that have already decayed. Generally, however, the uranium atoms are uniformly dispersed throughout the mineral so that the damage trails do not overlap. Thus, a mineral may be filled with invisible alpha-damage trails. Even in the instances when several uranium atoms, or even several hundred, are close enough to produce overlapping trails, this amount of overlap is still insufficient to produce noticeable color changes in the mineral.
In contrast, imagine billions of uranium atoms clustered in the tiny grain at a halo center. Alpha particles ejected from this grain can be compared to the appearance of a vast array of needles stuck into a point. To Joly it seemed quite plausible that the overlapping damage effects of this sunburst pattern of alpha particles might just be sufficient to produce the coloration seen in a halo. Figure 1.2 illustrates this effect.
Only one main question now remained: Did the sizes of the halo rings correspond to the path lengths of the uranium series alpha particles in mica? Measurements had shown alpha particles from the uranium decay chain traveled from about three to seven centimeters in air before coming to rest. Joly calculated that in mica alpha particles travel only 1/2000 as far as in air. Reducing the measured air-path lengths of the uranium series alpha particles by this factor gave values which did correspond to the ring sizes of one halo type he had found. The pieces of the puzzle had fallen into place. Joly proposed that alpha emission from the tiny halo center could account for both the sphericity and the size of the different shells comprising the halos. Moreover, the fact that alpha particles do most damage near the end of their paths would explain why the outer edges of halo rings could [p. 20] be darker than the interior regions. Thus Joly specifically identified uranium and a companion element, thorium, as radioactive elements that could produce pleochroic halos. Quite appropriately, they later became known as radioactive halos, or radiohalos.
Figure 1.3 graphically illustrates the idealized three-dimensional cross section of a uranium halo. Color photos of uranium halos appear in the Radiohalo Catalogue. Those photos show five rings of the uranium halo; these can be accounted for by the eight alpha emitters in the uranium decay chain as shown in Fig. 1.3. Figure 1.1 shows there are also six beta emitters in this chain, but, as just discussed, their interaction with mica is insufficient to produce halo rings.
Earth Science Associates